On June 3, 2026, the President signed Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement.” It reads less like a single new rule and more like a to-do list for the Department of Homeland Security and CBP, with deadlines of 45, 90 and 180 days. Several items have since turned into actual regulations; others are still in the pipeline. Here is how we explain it to clients, in the order they usually ask.
Why does this order matter so much?
Because it changes the starting assumption. For decades, almost anyone with an importer number, a bond and a broker could bring goods into the United States, including companies with no real presence here. The order treats importing as a privilege that has to be earned and kept. It aims at undervaluation, misdescribed goods, transshipment, unpaid duty bills and importers that disappear when CBP sends a bill. Honest importers are not the target, but they will feel it: more paperwork, more questions, less room to negotiate when something goes wrong.
What does the order tell CBP to do?
In short, six things:
- Raise the bar for every importer of record (IOR). CBP is to require a minimum level of U.S. assets, bonding or both; higher minimum bonds; and more information about each IOR, such as expected import volumes, year of organization, ownership and beneficial owners, affiliates and U.S. assets.
- Treat “foreign IORs” differently. The order creates two categories, “U.S. IOR” and “foreign IOR,” and puts extra conditions on the second: generally no continuous bond, and either CTPAT validation or a CTPAT-validated licensed broker. It also tells CBP to keep foreign IORs out of informal entries.
- Require “good standing.” An IOR, judged together with its affiliates’ compliance and payment history, must be in good standing with CBP. An IOR that is not may not import at all, or hand its imports to a broker to file as IOR. Importers found to have brought in fentanyl, nitazenes or their precursors are excluded outright.
- Collect more data at entry. Certifications of compliance with supply-chain laws, foreign tax and business identifiers, model or style numbers and key specifications, and the export documents the foreign exporter filed with its own customs authority.
- Cut back on mitigation. CBP is to set a floor of at least 50% of the assessed penalty, a minimum floor for liquidated damages, and no mitigation for repeat offenders.
- Seize and dispose faster. Easier voluntary abandonment, higher bonds for high-risk shipments, third-party disposal, and more use of summary forfeiture.
Who counts as a “U.S. importer of record”?
An individual qualifies if he or she is a U.S. citizen or green-card holder. A company qualifies only if it is organized under U.S. law, is genuinely located in the United States, and either is controlled by U.S. citizens or permanent residents or owns a significant amount of U.S. real property. Everyone else is a foreign IOR. That last sentence surprises people: a Delaware or California company owned by a parent in China, Hong Kong or Taiwan is likely to be a foreign IOR, even though it was formed here, unless it meets the real-property test. We cover this in detail in our separate articles on U.S. IORs and foreign IORs.
What has CBP actually done so far?
- August–September 2026. CBP told validated brokers to do heightened due diligence on foreign IOR clients, said it would void importer numbers with inaccurate registration data, and began enforcing the accuracy of CBP Form 5106 (the importer registration form) from September 18, 2026.
- September 2, 2026. An advance notice on supply-chain disclosures, with comments due December 1, 2026.
- October 8, 2026. A proposed rule on low-value shipments: shipments of $2,500 or less would have to be filed electronically before arrival and covered by a bond. Comments are due December 7, 2026.
- November 6, 2026. An interim final rule, “Heightened Requirements for Foreign Importers of Record,” that adds a new 19 C.F.R. part 110 defining U.S. and foreign IORs and requires foreign IORs to be CTPAT-validated or to use a CTPAT-validated broker. It takes effect January 5, 2027; comments are due the same day; brokers have until May 6, 2027 to come into full compliance.
What is still coming?
The minimum-asset requirement, the “good standing” test, the risk-tiered IOR registry and enhanced vetting were all due within 180 days, which is about the end of November 2026. The penalty-mitigation changes were due within 90 days. Some of these may arrive as guidance rather than formal rules, and the November rule itself leaves room for CBP to ban informal entries by foreign IORs later. If you import regularly, assume that each of these will land in the next few months and plan for it, rather than waiting to read about it.
What does a 50% penalty floor mean in practice?
Under 19 U.S.C. §1592, CBP first assesses a penalty based on culpability (negligence, gross negligence or fraud) and then, under its published mitigation guidelines, often reduces it substantially when the importer cooperates and fixes the problem. A floor of 50% of the assessed amount takes much of that room away. For a repeat violation, there may be no reduction at all. The practical lesson is simple: the cheapest time to find and fix an error is before CBP finds it. A valid prior disclosure under 19 C.F.R. §162.74 still caps exposure, generally at interest for negligence, and becomes more valuable, not less. Check whether CBP has published revised mitigation guidelines before relying on older settlement patterns.
We are a U.S.-owned company. Does any of this affect us?
Yes, though less dramatically. You will be asked to declare that you are a U.S. IOR on every entry, and your broker must collect and keep proof (ownership records, organizational documents, financial statements) for five years. Expect more detailed data requirements at entry, closer review of classification, valuation and country of origin, higher bonds if your duty exposure has grown, and less flexibility when a penalty notice arrives. If you buy from suppliers who have been acting as nonresident importers and shipping to you “delivered duty paid,” those arrangements may stop working, and the importer role may shift to you.
What should importers do now?
- Classify each importing entity. Work out, with documents, whether it is a U.S. IOR or a foreign IOR under the new test.
- Clean up your Form 5106. Names, addresses, ownership and contacts should be current and consistent with your bond and broker records.
- Talk to your broker. Is it CTPAT-validated? Has it asked for delayed compliance? What documents will it ask you for?
- Review your bond. Is it large enough for your current duty exposure, including Section 232 and 301 duties?
- Look back before CBP does. A focused review of classification, valuation, origin and any related-party pricing, followed by a prior disclosure where needed, is worth more now than it was a year ago.
- Revisit your contracts and Incoterms. Who will be the importer next year, and who pays if CBP sends a bill?
- Consider commenting. The interim rule is open for comments until January 5, 2027, and the low-value shipments proposal until December 7, 2026.
How can we help?
We help importers sort out whether they are U.S. or foreign IORs, restructure where that makes business sense, review entries and prepare prior disclosures, respond to CBP requests, seizures and penalty notices, and draft comments on the new rules. If you are not sure where you stand, send us your Form 5106, your ownership chart and a recent entry summary, and we can usually tell you quickly.
Sources: Executive Order 14411, Strengthening Customs Enforcement (June 3, 2026); CBP interim final rule, Heightened Requirements for Foreign Importers of Record, CBP Dec. 26-19 (Nov. 6, 2026); CBP proposed rule, Low-Value Shipments, 91 Fed. Reg. 64532 (Oct. 8, 2026); 19 U.S.C. §1592; 19 C.F.R. §162.74 and part 171. As of November 14, 2026. This article is general information, not legal advice.

